Terrorism+Case+Studies

Each of you have been assigned a case study that you are responsible for reading and answering questions. Your responses to the questions will be graded on based on your ideas and content. Please see the rubric below for a clearer view of how points will be determined. After you have posted your answers, you will also be required to respond to two peers question responses. Your responses should not just be a simple "I agree" or "I disagree" comment. Responses should be thought provoking and lead to more conversations or responses with other peers.


 * ** Original Question Responses ** || **10** || **7** || **5** || **3** || 0 ||
 * ** Ideas and Content ** || * Responses lead to greater insight and/or application of the topic
 * Responses relate to the case study and/or adds a greater significance to the topic || * Responses are relevant and effectively stated
 * Responses provide context for that issue || * Responses make a limited connection to the greater significance of the topic
 * Responses ineffectively rephrase main ideas || * Responses do not clearly provide context for the issue || * Responses do not relate to the topic and are not significant to the topic ||

_/10


 * ** Responses to Peers ** || **10** || **7** || **5** || **3** || 0 ||
 * ** Ideas and Content ** || * Responses lead to greater insight and/or application of the topic
 * Responses relate to the case study and/or adds a greater significance to the topic || * Responses are relevant and effectively stated
 * Responses provide context for that issue || * Responses make a limited connection to the greater significance of the topic
 * Responses ineffectively rephrase main ideas || * Responses do not not clearly provide context for the issue || * Responses do not relate to the topic and are not significant to the topic ||

10 point

5 points - following directions

/25 Total